|
The motivation and stimulus to establish this website was
twofold.
Firstly my eldest daughter, Katie, has been pestering me
for years to organise the various photographs and other
documents that I retained from my time in 55FST. Clearly the
material was not suitable assembling into any sort of
ring-binder but would lend itself to a website or DVD.
It also came to my knowledge that much of the documentation about the FSTs had gone
astray in the upsets to the RAMC that occurred in the middle to
late 90's, when under the influence of Commander Harris,
Millbank was closed and the move was made from London to Mytchett. It
seemed important to make some of the other material accumulated
at the time generally available.
The contribution made by medical services is rarely
acknowledged. Detailed descriptions of battles are commonplace
but the "butcher's bill" rarely has a mention other than in
simple figures of so many killed or wounded. The opportunity was
there to put that right.
Secondly, in the autumn or late summer of 2004 I saw a
television programme about a Field Hospital in Iraq. One clip
hit a raw nerve. A surgeon was standing in front of a high
tech anaesthetic machine which was festooned with variety of gas
bottles and he was suggesting that the patient that he had just
seen should now be dealt with by the unit neurosurgeon. The
circumstances were different from my experience. A single FST in
Oman in the 70's cannot be compared with the current large scale
military intervention in Iraq. Both campaigns settled down into
what one might now call "asymmetric warfare" with the
opportunities to develope static medical servicesin relatively
safe environments.
I had no issue with the surgeon. Modern surgeons generally have the
appellation “Specialist” rather than “General”. The RAMC
surgeons of the 70’s that I was used to were general surgeons
and were by necessity
versatile creatures who would turn their hand to any immediate
problem.
Even though I had not touched an anaesthetic machine since soon
after leaving Salalah I knew that, from my own experience, that
the chances of an efficient supply of gases was probably
“pie in the sky”. The supply of anything in a remote bit of
desert was and probably still is, at best, uncertain.
There is a MOD website devoted to a current field hospital in
Iraq. The provision of services and the degree of sophistication
is of the highest order and great credit is due to those who set
it up and manage the huge range of services that it offers.
Unless there has been a huge change since the 70's I believe
that reliance upon a long chain of supply and resupply would be
a problem. The ordering and supply of surgical and medical
materials electronically should in theory be very efficient. In
practice there are many opportunities for links in the chain to
fail and the more complex the databases of required materials
the more opportunities for failure.
The Haloxaire was a simple robust bit of kit which, with the
occasional use of oxygen and a limited portfolio of drugs, did
what it was meant to do. It was easy to use and did not require
an anaesthetist of any great experience to operate it. Halothane
has its disadvantages however and is not a strong analgesic. Following
on from the Haloxaire the design and developement of the
TriService Anaesthetic apparatus was another step forward. It
did however sometimes require the provision of a mechanical
ventilator and often used a combination of two inhalational
anaesthetics from two vapourisers. Some of the simplicity of the
Haloxaire was lost and it perhaps required a more skilled
anaesthetist than the short service medical officer. It was a
very versatile setup and could be used in a variety of ways
giving it distinct advantages over the Haloxaire especially in
the hands of an experienced anaesthetist.
I would suggest that
whilst it is important to have highly trained experienced
anaesthetists there is also a need to have "short service
anaesthetists" who can cope with the less complex and demanding
anaesthetics. The KISS principle applies and might very well
both overcome any shortages and provide a service where resupply
was a problem.
One could only ask whether the outcome for patients treated at
the vastly more complex Gulf War Hospital with its highly
trained and specialist staff was significantly
better than that at 55FST back in 1972?
We only saw a tiny number of patients. Were it possible it would
be interesting to make comparisons. If outcomes were not
statistically very different it makes a strong argument for
KISS.
|